The traditional sourcing model earns more when you know less. We built ours the other way around.
The easiest way to see the difference is to walk one programme through both paths. Below is a representative first run for a DTC carry-on brand — same product, same volume, same target landed cost — handled two different ways.
You message 30 factories on a sourcing platform. Fifteen reply. Eight send quotations. Three send samples. One matches the spec closely enough to consider. You negotiate unit price, pay a tooling deposit, book a freight slot, and find out at the port that a batch of frames is out of tolerance.
You send us the brief. We come back in a week with three factories matched to your product, your MOQ and your quality tier — and a frank view on whether the price target is realistic. You pick one. We run sampling, in-process checks and a final AQL inspection against your specification, with photo-documented reports at each gate.
These are the rough order-of-magnitude shifts we see in well-run programmes compared with a typical cold-start sourcing effort. They are not a guarantee for your run — your product, your factory and your starting point all matter — but they reflect what we see when the work is done properly.
Our commission is not an added cost if the work removes more cost than it charges. Here is where that happens.
Weeks of supplier back-and-forth collapse into days when the person asking speaks the factory's language — technical, commercial and cultural. Time is working capital.
A single failed production run costs more than a year of our fee. Thirty years of pattern knowledge is mostly the memory of what not to do.
We negotiate on your behalf and the factory invoices you directly. The saving stays on your side of the ledger, not in a spread.
Most agents price against what other agents charge. We price against what one bad outcome costs you — because that is the number the work actually moves.
Rework, air freight to recover the date, or a written-off run. This is the single largest avoidable cost in a luggage programme, and it is almost always decided at the specification stage rather than on the line.
Return handling and refunds at $40–70 per unit, plus the reviews that follow. A defect rate you can sell through and one you cannot is often one inspection gate apart.
A missing test report or audit document can hold a retail or marketplace launch by weeks. The goods are fine. The paperwork is not.
Our fee typically sits at a fraction of a single one of these events — indicative, and dependent on your order size, channel and product complexity. We will put the number in writing before any work starts.
Send us the product and the numbers. We will tell you what it would take and what it would cost.