In 2025 a bag brand founder posted their own unit economics on a public forum. No pitch, no product photography — just the arithmetic. The post drew 328 upvotes and a long thread of founders asking follow-up questions. That reaction is the reason this article exists.
Why we are publishing this
Most suppliers treat cost as a state secret. Most founders treat it as a black box they are afraid to open. And every founder who opens it discovers the same thing: the numbers are not unfair, they are just invisible.
So here is ours. If you are building a luggage brand in the $195–$260 band, this is roughly what your money buys — and, more usefully, where it stops buying anything.
The headline number: a $259 carry-on lands at about $78
Take the multiple that founder described and run it backwards:
- Retail price
- $259
- Landed cost (retail ÷ 3.33)
- approx. $78
- Gross margin
- approx. 70%
- Net margin (10–15% of revenue)
- $26–$39 per unit
Two caveats, stated up front. First, landed means delivered to your warehouse, including freight, duty and tariff. It does not include your ad spend, your 3PL or your returns. Second, the multiple is a starting point rather than a law: brands with real differentiation run higher, brands competing on price run lower and make it up on volume. The multiple tells you what the category tolerates, not what you can charge.
Where the $78 goes
Shares below are typical ranges across mid-premium hardside carry-ons. Your mix will shift with material choice, order quantity and how much of the bag you customise.
| # | Line item | Share of landed cost | What actually drives it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shell (PC / ABS / aluminium) | 20–26% | Resin grade, sheet thickness, and — critically — surface finish. Textured and matte finishes cost more to tool and more to reject. |
| 2 | Wheel assembly | 8–12% | Bearing type, tread material and housing. A replaceable, screw-fixed assembly costs more upfront than a riveted one. |
| 3 | Telescoping handle | 7–10% | Number of stages, wall thickness, and the tolerance you specify. Tolerance is where cheap handles quietly get cheaper. |
| 4 | Zippers & locks | 5–7% | YKK versus generic, coil versus chain, water-resistant tape, and whether the lock is integrated or recessed. |
| 5 | Interior (lining, dividers, compression) | 8–11% | Lining weight, panel count and hardware. Light-coloured lining costs slightly more and is worth it. |
| 6 | Labour | 13–17% | Driven by stitch count and assembly complexity. Simpler interiors are cheaper and often better. |
| 7 | Hardware & trim | 4–6% | Feet, rivets, logo treatment, top and side handles. |
| 8 | Tooling amortisation | 0–8% | Effectively zero on an open mold. The single biggest reason MOQ matters on a custom one, where it only makes sense spread over volume. |
| 9 | Packaging | 3–5% | Polybag, carton, corner protection. Directly tied to your damage rate in transit. |
| 10 | Freight, duty & tariff | 9–15% | The most volatile line on the sheet. Model it as a range, never as a number. |
The pattern worth noticing: lines 2, 3 and 4 — wheels, handle, zippers — are a minority of the cost and a majority of the complaints. More on that below.
What the multiple actually pays for
This is the part founders underestimate. The gap between $78 and $259 is not profit. It is the cost of having customers at all.
| Brand-side cost | Share of revenue |
|---|---|
| Advertising | approx. 30% (optimised operations run approx. 20%) |
| Payroll | 20–30% |
| Warehousing & fulfilment | 8–12% |
| Returns, warranty, payment fees | 5–10% |
| Net margin | 10–15% |
A luggage brand selling at $259 keeps roughly $26–$39 per bag. That is the number to hold in your head when you are negotiating $2 off a unit price. Two dollars is 5–8% of your entire profit. It is also, very often, the difference between a wheel housing that survives two years and one that survives six months.
The three lines you should never cut
We spend a lot of time reading what travellers actually complain about, and the failure pattern is remarkably consistent. One widely-read discussion produced this summary from a former airline baggage handler who estimated he had handled over 25,000 pieces: zippers catch, wheels pop off, and handles jam.
Consistent with that, the parts most often named in complaint threads are:
- Wheels — the single most common failure point, and also the cheapest thing to make repairable.
- Zippers — the second most common, and a security weak point: TSA master keys are trivially available online, and a coil zipper can be opened with a pen and closed again without leaving a mark.
- Telescoping handles — usually a tolerance problem rather than a materials problem.
Here is the asymmetry that makes this commercially interesting: upgrading these three lines moves your landed cost by a small amount, and moves your review profile by a large one. A screw-fixed, replaceable wheel assembly is a modest BOM increase. The alternative — a customer who cannot repair the bag and writes about it — costs far more than the delta.
The same logic runs in reverse. Cutting here saves pennies and buys returns. As one importer put it in a widely-read sourcing guide: the factories will sacrifice quality to meet your price. They are not being dishonest. They are being rational. If you remove the margin without removing a specification, the factory will remove the specification for you.
Working backwards from your target price
If you are early, start here instead of starting with a factory quote:
- Pick your retail band and defend it. In the current market $150–$300 is where most credible independent carry-ons sit. Around $200 is roughly the ceiling where buyers do not need to talk themselves into it; $250–$300 requires a warranty story to support it.
- Divide by your multiple to get a target landed cost. Use 3.33× if you have no better number, then replace it with your own.
- Allocate to the three lines first. Decide what you are spending on wheels, handle and zippers before you design anything else. These are your product’s actual reputation.
- Check tooling against volume. If your first run is 300 units, a custom shell mold may never amortise. Open mold plus genuine hardware and interior customisation is often the better first product.
- Model freight and duty as a range. Never as a single number.
- Then — and only then — negotiate. Arriving with a specification sheet is the difference between a conversation about price and a conversation about quality. Factories respond to precise requirements. They respond to vague ones by quoting low and adjusting later.
What this means if you are launching
Three things follow from the arithmetic above.
Your first product should be small, not cheap. A 300-unit run at a defensible specification beats a 3,000-unit run you cannot sell through. Inventory is where growth-stage profit goes to die — most of your margin is reinvested in stock before you ever see it.
Your warranty is a supply chain decision, not a marketing one. Before you promise lifetime coverage, work out whether you can ship a replacement wheel to Ohio in three days. Travellers have become openly sceptical of lifetime warranties from young brands, and their objection is simple and fair: a company that is five years old may not be around in fifteen to honour it. A specific, funded, logistically real warranty beats an ambitious one.
Every document you receive from your supplier should be something you can show a customer. Your dimensional test report belongs on your product page. Your wheel cycle-test data belongs in a blog post. In a category where shoppers openly doubt whether any brand’s claims are independent, the ability to publish evidence is itself a competitive advantage. It is the reason we design every deliverable to serve twice — as a quality record for your team, and as evidence you can publish.
One honest caveat
Everything above describes the mid-premium hardside segment — roughly the $195–$260 retail band, produced in Asia, sold direct to consumers in North America and Europe. Soft-side, aluminium, and luggage sold through distributor channels all run on different economics. If you are building in one of those, the structure of this analysis holds; the numbers do not.
Want these numbers for your own product?
Send us your target retail price, order quantity and the specification you are working to. We will tell you which lines are realistic, which are optimistic, and which one the factory is most likely to change quietly — whether or not you end up working with us.
Start a Conversation →